Dylan Bilek        

Des 40A

Professor Cogdell

Materials Analysis of Kodak Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) for Life Cycle

Displays are made of many layers that come together to emit the primary colors of the additive color spectrum, red, green, and blue. Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLED) uses organic compounds to emit its light rather than inorganic materials as seen in LEDs. The OLED this report is looking at is an OLED patented by KODAK in 2003 (Cok). The basic layer construction is the encapsulation layer, the anode hole transport layer, the light emission layer, and the electron transport layer, the cathode, and the substrate. OLED screens incorporate a mix of organic and inorganic materials in its layers. The organic components come from organic origin while the inorganic components originate from mostly metals. I will be investigating the materials of indium tin oxide (ITO), MgAg, NPB, ADN, Alq3, and glass as they are collected, used, and disposed of in a 2003 Kodak OLED screen.

ITO is a typical anode for OLED screens but can also be used as the cathode. In this case the anode and cathode provide the electrons and holes to the device. It is a popular material for display uses due to its high conductivity and its high transparency. ITO is a clear ceramic material made from indium, tin, and oxygen. The indium is mainly sourced from China and the Republic of Korea (Mineral Commodity), the tin is sourced from China, Indonesia, Myanmar/Burma, and Peru (Mineral Commodity), and the oxygen can be easily sourced from the air. Indium is refined as a by-product of zinc refining. The procedure is proprietary though there are some general reports that are available (Fthenakis et al.). At the start, zinc gets roasted and leached with dilute sulfuric acid and the residue gets leached again with hydrochloric acid. Soda is added to draw the indium out of the solution. In each step, a small amount of indium is removed and collected. Tin extraction starts with roasting cassiterite at 2500°F and then is leached with acid or other solutions to remove impurities (General Kinematics). There are two production methods that can be taken to produce the ITO on the device. The first is to combine indium oxide and tin oxide together in solution to make ITO. Then, it is hit with an energetic ion and sputtered onto the device. Sputtering is when material is ejected from the target material onto the substrate, usually by an energetic ion. The second is taking the indium oxide and tin oxide and putting them through chemical or physical vapor deposition. They would be heated till they evaporate and combine on the surface of the substrate as an ITO film (Nakane et al.). It is possible to recycle ITO by itself and there are methods to unbind an ITO layer from a thin film stack (Dang et al.). ITO is also very toxic due to indium being very toxic. The indium can potentially leach out of the device if not sealed well and can spread dust which can cause negative health effects (Badding et al.). 

A Magnesium silver alloy (MgAg) may also be used as the cathode as the cathode in KODAK OLED does not send light through the cathode. In fact, the alloy may be useful in reflecting any light back out of the device. MgAg is made through melting down silver and magnesium and mixing them together (Leodeun@gmail.com). In order to deposit the material into the device in a layer, sputtering would be used due to it being easier to keep an alloy when transferring it into a layer (Plasmaterials). The magnesium would be sourced from mainly China while the silver would be mainly sourced from Mexico (Mineral Commodity). 

Organic materials are what sets OLEDs apart from other display types. They allow for the generation of light at specific points on the display and can be fully turned off. This means that there is no need for the backlight that other displays needed before. The lack of backlight allowed for darker colors to be shown as there would be no light bleeding through. In this KODAK design, the Organic materials make up the hole transport layer, the electron transport layer, and the emission layer. Organic materials have very long and complicated fabrication processes that are often proprietary to each manufacturing company. It is also common to simply purchase the chemicals needed for whatever synthesis stem is needed. This means that it is possible for every step in the process to be done by a separate manufacturer. In this paper, a potential route will be suggested for the creation of each material in order to show that complexity. 

N,N'-Bis(3-methylphenyl)-N,N'-bis(phenyl)benzidine or NPB is the material used for the hole transport layer. This layer is responsible for transporting holes, or lack of electrons in orbitals, from the electrode to the emission layer. NPB’s manufacturing process starts out with extracting decalin from types of fungus (Li et al.).Then the decalin is dehydrogenated to naphthalene (Kim et al.). The naphthalene is then disulfonated with olem to create naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid or Armstrong's acid. The acid is then used in the synthesis process of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene (Booth) which then undergoes nucleophilic aromatic substitution and catalytic reduction to finally reach the NPB (PubChem). NPB used to be a popular material for the hole transport layer, however as time moved on, there were new materials being discovered (Thejo Kalyani and Dhoble). This did not fully take NPB out of the market but it is still an older material. 

9,10-Bis(2-naphthyl)anthracene or ADN is the organic material that makes up the emission layer. The emission layer takes in the holes and electrons from the transport layers and recombines them which releases energy in the form of photons. The recombination mechanism is the electron filling the hole, lacking an electron which drops the energy of the electron by a specific amount of energy dependent on the material. The manufacture of ADN in this paper will start with 5,5-Dimethylhydantoin being combined with a brominating agent to make 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin (Elnagar et al.). Then, 1,3-dibromo-5,5-dimethylhydantoin is combined with anthracene to make 9-Bromoanthracene and 9,10-Dibromoanthracene (Chemicalbook). The 9,10-Dibromoanthracene is then combined with many more chemicals to finally reach 9,10-Bis(2-naphthyl)anthracene (Xiang et al.). ADN is an old emission layer material and has since stopped seeing use due to more efficient materials being found (Thejo Kalyani and Dhoble). 

Tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum or Alq3 is the last organic material in the KODAK OLED and is used as the electron transport layer. The electron transport layer works similarly to the hole transport layer but with electrons rather than the lack of electrons. Alq3’s manufacturing process that will be described is much simpler than the others due to the founding chemicals being commonly marketable but even the common chemicals have long synthesis chains. This starts with 5N Al2O3 and 8-hydroxyquinolinol which are combined as  5N Al2O3 is the solid component in 8-hydroxyquinolinol gas at 190-240°C. Phosphorus anhydride is also used to remove water from the reaction (Avetisov et al.). Alq3 has a similar popularity to NPB with it being one of the more common OLED materials for electron transport while still finding use in modern times (Thejo Kalyani and Dhoble).

The organic materials are placed together in the middle of the device with the emissive layer in between the two transports. The hole transport connects to the anode and the electron transport connects to the cathode. They are deposited on the device using physical vapor deposition where they are turned into a gaseous form, usually at high temperatures, and collected on the substrate. After the device has been shipped out and used, the organic materials need to be disposed of. When looking at the individual reports, they all state the same information. The organic materials are typically burned but specific cities or states may have other methods of disposal (Ossila: NPB, ADN, Alq3). Not all KODAK cameras may make it to the incinerator, the safety data sheets mention that they should not be released to the environment however they do not specify why. 

Glass is an important material for the KODAK OLED display. It is used in two layers as the main substrate that the device is initially grown off of as well as the encapsulation layer to keep the outside environment off of the device. Other materials can be used for these two layers but glass is typically the option chosen. Glass is made up of silica sand and soda ash. Silica sand is mainly mined from the US and China but many other countries are also mining (Mineral Commodity). Soda ash is mined in the US, Turkey and a few others (Mineral Commodity) but it can also be synthesized with salt, limestone, coking coal, and ammonia. The synthesis process is potentially dying out due to its energy cost (Scott).  The silica sand, soda ash, and any additives are heated in a mixing silo at 1600°C. Then the molten mixture is set on a molten tin bath to ensure the face is flat. Since molten tin is a liquid, it will take the shape with the least surface area in a container. This creates a perfectly flat surface as long as there is no vibrations. The glass and tin do not mix well which allows this process to be achieved. Lastly the glass is cooled out of the tin bath at around 600°C, at which the glass is solid enough to be moved on rollers. The glass is then annealed and rolled to achieve the correct internal stress which strengthens the glass (Saint-Gobain). After it is manufactured, it shall be cut down and placed on the device. The glass substrate will have every other layer deposited on top of it while the encapsulating glass can use physical or chemical vapor deposition to build it up. After the device has been used to its fullest, glass is very good at being recycled. As with any device that is made of thin layers, separating the layers is quite hard but if achieved, glass is known to be almost infinitely recyclable due to its ability to be melted down and reformed (Momentum Recycling). However, this may not be the case as since KODAK produced cameras, the display may be discarded in a waste bin and not properly disposed of. In this case the glass could become quite a hazard. When broken, it can be a danger to any nearby due to its sharp edges (Laico). Glass can also contaminate other recycling processes which emphasizes the importance of separation of materials. Overall glass is a common material used in many applications and is the most recyclable material in the OLED.  

This paper looked into the main materials used in the patented design from KODAK. These materials include ITO, MgAg, NPB, ADN, Alq3, and glass. Each of these materials has a specific part to play in the device. ITO and MgAg being the electrode materials due to their conductivity and ITO’s clarity, NPB and Alq3 for transporting the necessary charge carriers and making the device more efficient, glass for growing and protecting the device, and ADN for producing the all important light. While ITO, MgAg and glass can potentially be recycled, without proper separation there could be contamination and issues with the recycling process. Meanwhile, The organic materials seem to be not recyclable at all and the common disposal method is incineration. There is room for improvement as newer devices require more efficient or more eco friendly materials (Thejo Kalyani and Dhoble). Though as devices improved, the amount of layers increased (Geffroy et al.) which means more difficulty in separation especially as the displays get thinner and thinner. It may be best to pay attention to the current displays and make sure they are keeping waste in mind as many electronics companies do not.

Bibliography

“9,10-Dibromoanthracene Synthesis.” Chemicalbook, www.chemicalbook.com/synthesis/9-10-dibromoanthracene.htm. Accessed 5 June 2024.

“ADN - 9,10-Bis(2-Naphthyl)Anthrace.” Ossila, www.ossila.com/products/adn. Accessed 5 June 2024.

“ALQ3.” Ossila, www.ossila.com/products/alq3?_pos=1&_sid=fde4d667a&_ss=r. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Avetisov, Roman, et al. “One-step synthesis of high pure tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum for optics and Photonics.” Materials, vol. 15, no. 3, 19 Jan. 2022, p. 734, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030734.

Badding, Melissa A., et al. “Pulmonary toxicity of indium‐tin oxide production facility particles in rats.” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 36, no. 4, 15 Oct. 2015, pp. 618–626, https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3253.

Booth, Gerald. “Naphthalene derivatives.” Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 15 June 2000, https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a17_009.

Cok, Ronald S. OLED Display and Touch Screen. 7 Nov. 2006.

Dang, Minh Trung, et al. “Recycling indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes used in thin-film devices with adjacent hole-transport layers of metal oxides.” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 3, no. 12, 16 Nov. 2015, pp. 3373–3381, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01080.

Elnagar, Hassan  Y., et al. 1,3-Dibromo-5,5-Dimethylhydantoin of Enhanced Properties. 21 Jan. 2003.

Fthenakis, Vasilis, et al. “Life cycle inventory analysis of the production of metals used in photovoltaics.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 3, Apr. 2009, pp. 493–517, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.11.012.

Geffroy, Bernard, et al. “Organic light‐emitting diode (OLED) technology: Materials, devices and display technologies.” Polymer International, vol. 55, no. 6, 6 Feb. 2006, pp. 572–582, https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1974. 

“Glass Recycling Process.” Momentum Recycling, 11 Aug. 2022, utah.momentumrecycling.com/glass-recycling-process/.

Kim, Kyeounghak, et al. “Different catalytic behaviors of PD and PT metals in decalin dehydrogenation to naphthalene.” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 7, no. 17, 2017, pp. 3728–3735, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cy00569e.

Laico, Steve. “The Glass Recycling Problem: What’s behind It, and What to Do.” Great Forest, 7 Nov. 2023, greatforest.com/sustainability101/the-glass-recycling-problem-whats-behind-it-and-what-to-do/#:~:text=Glass%20is%20infinitely%20recyclable%20without,material%20maintains%20much%20public%20support.

Leodeun@gmail.com. “Magnesium Alloy Manufacturing Process: Diecastor.” China Professional Die Casting Company For Aluminium | Zinc, 10 May 2024, diecastor.com/magnesium-alloy-manufacturing-process-method/#:~:text=Magnesium%20alloy%20can%20be%20produced,sand%20and%20self%2Dhardening%20resin.

Li, Hang, et al. “Fungal polyketide-nonribosomal peptide synthetases and their associated natural products.” Comprehensive Natural Products III, 2020, pp. 415–444, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.14677-3.

Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2024. 

Nakane, Y., et al. “Formation of indium-tin oxide (ito) films by the dynamic mixing method.” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 59–60, July 1991, pp. 264–267, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583x(91)95219-4.

National Center for Biotechnology Information. "PubChem Compound Summary for CID 103315, N,N'-Bis(3-methylphenyl)-N,N'-bis(phenyl)benzidine" PubChem, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/103315. Accessed 5 June, 2024.

“NPB (NPD).” Ossila, www.ossila.com/products/npb?_pos=1&_sid=b32d8bbb4&_ss=r. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Plasmaterials. “Sputtering of Alloys.” Plasmaterials, plasmaterials.com/sputtering-of-alloys/. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Scott, Alex. “Can Synthetic Soda Ash Survive?” Chemical & Engineering News, American Chemical Society, 22 Feb. 2023, cen.acs.org/business/specialty-chemicals/synthetic-soda-ash-survive/101/i7. 

Thejo Kalyani, N., and S.J. Dhoble. “Novel materials for Fabrication and encapsulation of oleds.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 44, Apr. 2015, pp. 319–347, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.070.

“Tin Mining and Processing: Everything You Need to Know.” General Kinematics, General Kinematics, 21 Sept. 2023, www.generalkinematics.com/blog/tin-mining-processing-everything-need-know/.

“What Is Glass?” Saint, in.saint-gobain-glass.com/knowledge-center/glass-manufacturing-process. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Xiang, Ning, et al. “Synthesis and properties of novel 9,10-Di(Naphthalen-2-yl)anthracene derivatives.” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 57, no. 17, Apr. 2016, pp. 1847–1851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.03.048. 

Stella Chung

Desmond Chua, Dylan Bilek

DES 40A

Professor Cogdell

The Life Cycle of Kodak Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) screen: embodied energy 

In response to the demand for thinner, brighter screens on our everyday devices, the display technologies industry has rapidly advanced over the last two decades. From the various screens produced in this advancement, the Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) screens have caught international attention for its thin, bendable design and superior display quality compared to traditional liquid crystal displays (LCDs). Due to the widespread manufacturing and use of display technologies, the hardware tech industry has become a major environmental and social concern. Interested parties are skeptical about the industry standards for OLED and the environmental and labor conditions under which it is produced. This study presents a comprehensive cradle-to-grave analysis of the energy use associated with the six stages of the Life Cycle Assessment of the 2003 Kodak Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) screen of the life cycle assessment and uses this information on embodied energy to argue the importance of placing a focus on energy efficiency and sustainability efforts in the "use reuse + maintenance" stage of the life cycle. 

Since its discovery in 1987, the OLED screen has taken over the leaderboard as the industry standard for display technology. It is being mass-produced at a rapid rate with little environmental or ethical transparency or regulations around the manufacturing process; a life cycle analysis of the OLEDs' embodied energy is crucial to gain context of the technology's impact on a sustainability standpoint. With partnerships with companies such as Apple, Huawei, Samsung, LG, and more for their devices, OLED is one of the most popular up-and-coming technology for screen displays available on the market. (Business Insider). The OLED is desirable because of it's design utilizing organic compounds to emit visible light, a revolutionary innovation that stands out from former display technologies on the market that relies on a separate backlight layer for its brightness. Without the need for a backlight, the OLED becomes thinner, flexible, and with faster response time a higher contrast ratio than an LCD than any other screens on the market, making the screens increasingly popular in computer, smartphones, and TV designs (Williams). In 2024, LG Display and Samsung Display are planning to ship 8.9 million units of displays for the new iPad Pro series. The OLED Panel Market size is estimated at USD 51.63 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 95.93 billion by 2029, growing at a CAGR of 13.19% during the forecast period (2024-2029) (Mordor Intelligence). Now, it is more important than ever to pay attention to the growth of the OLED industry due to the recent economic need for increased OLED production and manufacturing, which could pose devastating environmental and ethical impacts down the supply line during mass production if not responsibly monitored.

This report will bring an overview of the OLED industry and the process of OLED creation to the general public interested in technological sustainability. The current literature on OLED LCA consists of a handful of researchers tracing product components with great detail and accuracy. However, that information is reported through highly technical jargon and published behind the academic paywall, making it inaccessible to those without subscriptions to scientific databases. I hope to provide an additional source of accessible information to the public by summarizing and pinpointing processes where the public can demand environmental regulation on a public website; for clarity purposes, I have decided to adhere to the order of the LCA cycle from extraction of raw materials to waste management when approaching this paper for those who wish to follow the LCA of the OLED in its manufacturing process. 

The extraction of raw materials for the 2003 Kodak relies on machinery that uses extensive nonrenewable carbon-based energy consumption. The 2003 Kodak OLED is made from several raw materials, mainly ITO made from Indium and Tin (ITO), Glass, Indium, MgAg, a mix of magnesium and silver, and a glass backing. ITO is an important material that enables electrical conductance on a substrate for display products, however, its material production and film fabrication involve energy-intensive processes (Inganäs, 2011); the production of ITO (Indium and tin) in OLED is extracted with a mix of human labor and nonrenewable sources of hydrocarbons such as crude oil to operate large mining and processing machinery. Going into detail about individual materials, Tin is extracted using a mix of carbon-based thermal energy by roasting the mineral cassiterite and then leaching with acid or water solutions and electrostatic or magnetic shaker tables (Geoscience Australia). Much like Tin extraction, Indium extraction uses a blend of chemical, thermal, and electrical energy to prepare. Indium is a somewhat rare metal obtained as a byproduct of zinc mining, which uses a process of leaching, purification, and electrolytic recovery (Alfantazi et al.). The metal is then evaporated onto glass to create what we would know as an "OLED screen" using thermal energy. Magnesium is extracted from natural minerals or seawater and produced through several different methods inducing the electrolytic heating process or thermal reduction (International Magnesium Association). Silver is mined through open-pit and underground methods using machinery to mine deposits near the earth's surface or tunneling into the ground to extract silver ores, which are then crushed, ground, and separated through a process of "floatation", much like indium, 73% of silver comes from the byproduct of zinc mining. (Reddy). While there are no exact calculations for the machinery used to mine these products, the use of fossil fuels and gas in machines can become substantial if the heavy use of carbon-powered machinery to acquire raw materials continues.

Using the LCA framework, the energy consumption of the manufacturing stage is significantly lower compared to that of the distribution and transportation stage. The manufacturing, processing, and formulation of the 2003 Kodak OLED screen takes place in East Asia, so transportation and distribution stages take place locally and internationally, with international distribution and transportation having much heavier energy consumption than the manufacturing process.  

The tech hardware industry does not usually provide information transparency about this step of the life cycle. While there is no publicly available information on the exact source materials of the Kodak OLED, we can roughly assume that the raw materials are extracted and manufactured in China, Japan, and Korea because they are the largest manufacturers of most materials in the OLED, and also due to the fact that the 2003 Kodak OLED is a joint venture between American company Eastman Kodak and Japanese electronics manufacturer Sanyo Electric Co., LTD. (Allen). China is by far the world's largest market for tin and also the largest producing country, now accounting for around 40% of world refined tin consumption and production (Kay), as well as being responsible for the majority of the world's glass production (Statista), and zinc, which produces Indium and Silver as byproducts as well, for Indium. More specifically, the largest producers of Indium are in South Korea and China (American Chemical Society). It is fair to assume that these countries are the material sources of the  2003 OLED, and that assembly takes place in Sanyo's factories in Japan. 

I have taken a rough estimation of the average Co2 estimation for the transportation between Japan, South Korea, and China, which is relatively close compared to its distribution to the rest of the world. In contrast, air distribution to countries such as America takes up a significant amount of energy, as it is further and usually done by air or maritime cargo transport. The average air freight from China to Japan has 66kg CO₂ (per 100kg) emissions, and South Korea to Japan has 33kg CO₂ emissions. Compared to distributions from Japan to Europe (545kg CO₂) or from Japan to San Francisco (325kg CO₂) (Fluent Cargo). For this reason, shifting transportation down the supply chain from air to sea would be strategic, reducing the carbon footprint by 20 to 30 times (Kilgore). Additionally, excluding the use of energy, researchers have named distribution as the most significant contributor to GWP (Global Warming Potential) at 44%, and eliminating the need to transport the OLED materials via air presents the most significant opportunity to reduce the GWP of the OLED (New York State Pollution Prevention Institute)

Like most electrically powered products, the generation of the energy required to power the panel during use in the "use, reuse and maintenance" stage for the life cycle far outpaces the environmental impact of the panel during any other LCA stage, making it the most crucial point of concern for OLED energy sustainability efforts. The energy required to power the OLED during use contributes to "98 percent of the total GWP in terms of embodied energy, and 78–99 percent to all other impact factors." (New York State Pollution Prevention Institute, 2). While improvements to other stages in the OLED life cycle also have the potential for reducing environmental impact(s), the largest opportunity for improvement is to increase energy efficiency of the OLED. In fact, the same study found that for every 1% increase in energy efficiency during use, the life cycle GWP is reduced by about 1%. Some companies even claim that certain models of OLED have a GWP of 77.5 kg CO2e over its lifetime, equivalent to the average car driving 195 miles, less than a one-way car from New York City to Washington, D.C. However, this has yet to be put in the context of the sheer amount of OLED screens produced and used daily in the original source. (OLEDworks)

In a study comparing the energy assessment of an OLED light device against the inorganic light LED, it has been discovered that the OLED studied is more energy efficient at a luminous efficacy of 7.8 lm/W against the traditional inorganic LED light; however, the blue inorganic LED has a factor of 1.8 longer operational lifetime than the longest operating P-OLED (17.1 years for the inorganic LED), which means that the OLED would have to be replaced more frequently (Carter).  The research concludes on an optimistic note, with hope in the OLED screen's future as a superior display technology and an innovation of great sustainable potential if further developed for energy efficiency and device durability during Use, reuse and maintenance stage. 

The last stage to address is the recycling and waste management of the OLED. Organic materials are recovered via pyrolysis or solvent extraction, both of which require substantial energy inputs. These methods are often powered by labor and fossil fuels. The recycling of glass and metals such as tin and indium involves crushing, melting, and recycling, all of which necessitate the use of fossil fuel-powered machines. Organic compounds are sorted and burned for fuel, while fossil fuel-based compactors crush and incinerate the remaining materials for the landfill. While this is an important aspect of sustainability, it is reassuring to note that landfilling the OLED at the end of its life is not a significant contributor to environmental impacts. It contributes only 0.5% of the GWP and less than 5% to all other impacts, with most below 1%. ((Rochester Institute of Technology)

This study has compared the cradle-to-grave analysis of energy use of the 2003 Kodak Organic Light-Emitting Diode screen. By closely evaluating the energy consumption and environmental impact of the stages and identifying use, reuse, and maintenance of energy levels as the highest point of energy use. By focusing on these critical areas we can start to improve the overall sustainability of the OLED technology market to shape the manufacturing process into an increasingly environmentally conscious market in the future. 

This assignment was very illuminating in terms of content and gave me a broad look into how a lack of information and collaboration between industry personnel, academic scholars, and the general public can create a lack of transparency that allows room for potentially unsustainable industry practices to take place with little to no effective regulations or clarity on market impact. There is substantial work to be done in technology manufacturing regarding international human rights, environmental and economic law, academic environmental science and research, and global public engagement sectors. 

Works Cited

A.M. Alfantazi, and R.R. Moskalyk. “Processing of Indium: A Review.” Minerals Engineering, vol. 16, no. 8, 1 Aug. 2003, pp. 687–694, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0892687503001687, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-6875(03)00168-7. Accessed 5 June 2024.

International Magnesium Association. "About Magnesium" Intlmag.org, 2020, www.intlmag.org/page/basics_about_mg_ima#:~:text=In%20the%20thermal%2Dreduction%20method,which%20later%20condense%20into%20crystals. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Allen, Paul. “Kodak, Sanyo Form Joint Venture to Manufacture OLED Displays - News.” Compound Semiconductor, Compound Semiconductor, 2023, compoundsemiconductor.net/article/81556/Kodak_Sanyo_Form_Joint_Venture_to_Manufacture_OLED_Displays. Accessed 4 June 2024.

Carter, Catrice M, et al. “Cost, Energy and Emissions Assessment of Organic Polymer Light-Emitting Device Architectures.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 137, 1 Nov. 2016, pp. 1418–1431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.186. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Fluent Cargo."“China to South Korea by Air Freight, Cargo Ship or Road" Fluentcargo.com, 2020, www.fluentcargo.com/routes/china/south-korea. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Geoscience Australia. “Tin.” Geoscience Australia, 17 May 2018, www.ga.gov.au/education/minerals-energy/australian-mineral-facts/tin#:~:text=The%20main%20method%20of%20mining,is%20washed%20and%20roughly%20concentrated. Accessed 4 June 2024.

“Indium - Minerals Education Coalition.” Minerals Education Coalition, 17 July 2023, mineralseducationcoalition.org/elements/indium/. Accessed 4 June 2024.

Kay, Nimmo. “Mining Regions - International Tin Association.” International Tin Association, 11 May 2021, www.internationaltin.org/mining-regions/. Accessed 4 June 2024.

Kilgore, Georgette. “Air Freight vs Sea Freight Carbon Footprint (the Real Numbers in 2023).” 8 Billion Trees: Carbon Offset Projects & Ecological Footprint Calculators, 30 June 2022, 8billiontrees.com/carbon-offsets-credits/carbon-ecological-footprint-calculators/air-freight-vs-sea-freight-carbon-footprint/#:~:text=However%2C%20ships%20emit%20only%20between,of%20carbon%20dioxide%20per%20kilometer.&text=The%20carbon%20footprint%20of%20airplanes,items%20than%20the%20ocean%20freight. Accessed 5 June 2024.

“Kodak, Sanyo Form Joint Venture to Manufacture OLED Displays - News.” Compound Semiconductor, Compound Semiconductor, 2023, compoundsemiconductor.net/article/81556/Kodak_Sanyo_Form_Joint_Venture_to_Manufacture_OLED_Displays. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Eri Amasawa, et al. “Life Cycle Assessment of Organic Light Emitting Diode Display as Emerging Materials and Technology.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 135, 1 Nov. 2016, pp. 1340–1350, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616309131?via=ihub#bib19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.025. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Mordor Intelligence. “OLED Panel Market Size & Share Analysis - Industry Research Report - Growth Trends.” Mordorintelligence.com, 2024, www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/oled-panel-market. Accessed 5 June 2024.

New York State Pollution Prevention Institute. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Impacts of an OLED. Rochester Institute of Technology, 2021, f.hubspotusercontent40.net/hubfs/6680197/Gated%20Content/OLEDWorks%20-%20LCA%20Study%20-%20Full.pdf?utm_campaign=Sustainability%20Report%20Campaign&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8lfDdCzEcc91UBhPn-5f4L4qU1clj0nCeS4OZTfLi8e0gKV1C0Slzyr90FkU0JcAC1Jm3dGGCPGZkGmofXAEkFnstrwg&_hsmi=167369890&utm_content=167369890&utm_source=hs_automation. Accessed 3 June 2024.

OLEDworks. “How Sustainable Are Our OLED Lighting Panels? LCA Study Shows Benefits.” OLEDWorks, 3 Aug. 2022, www.oledworks.com/blog/how-sustainable-are-our-oled-lighting-panels-lca-study/. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Reddy, Rohan. “Silver, Explained.” Global X ETFs, 9 June 2022, www.globalxetfs.com/silver-explained-2/#:~:text=silver%20mining%20stocks%3F-,How%20and%20Where%20Is%20Silver%20Extracted%3F,the%20extraction%20of%20the%20ore. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Rochester Institute of Technology ‌. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Impacts of an OLED CASE STUDY.

Statista. “Glass Top Exporting Countries Worldwide 2022 | Statista.” Statista, Statista, 2022, www.statista.com/statistics/1079836/leading-glass-glassware-exporting-countries-globally-based-value/. Accessed 5 June 2024.

Williams, Nicola. “OLED vs LED.” Ossila, 2021, www.ossila.com/pages/oleds-vs-leds#:~:text=OLEDs%20are%20thinner%20than%20LEDs,for%20foldable%20or%20rollable%20displays.&text=Individual%20OLED%20pixels%20generate%20their,the%20pixel%20is%20turned%20off.&text=OLEDs%20have%20a%20faster%20response%20time%20than%20LEDs. Accessed 4 June 2024.

Business Insider. “Apple Approves Mass Production of OLED Screens for Three Upcoming IPhone 16 Models.” Markets.businessinsider.com, markets.businessinsider.com, 28 May 2024, markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/apple-approves-mass-production-of-oled-screens-for-three-upcoming-iphone-16-models-1033428627#:~:text=(RTTNews)%20%2D%20Apple%20(AAPL,report%20by%20Korea%27s%20The%20Elec. Accessed 5 June 2024.

‌

Desmond Chua

DES 40A

Professor Cogdell

5 June 2024

Life Cycle of Kodak OLED Screen Waste and Emissions

With its improved display quality and energy economy, OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) panels are becoming more and more common in current technology. From your television to your Apple Watch, OLED is celebrated for its superior display quality and energy efficiency compared to traditional LCD screens. OLEDs have richer blacks and vivid colors, which makes them a popular option for devices like televisions and cell phones. Notwithstanding these benefits, the OLED panel life cycle material extraction to disposal has a substantial environmental effect. These effects are a result of the waste and pollutants that are produced during the extraction of raw materials, the production process, the use phase, and, in the end, the screen disposal (Verlag). Our research conducts a cradle-to-grave investigation into the raw materials, energy use, and consumption of the 2003 Kodak Organic Light-Emitting Diode “OLED” Screen (Cok) by addressing all 6 steps of the Life Cycle Assessment measured by the use of raw materials and embodied energy, and wastes & emissions produced. This essay explores these environmental challenges, highlighting the urgent need for more sustainable practices in the production and disposal of OLED screens.

The raw material acquisition stage of the Kodak OLED screen involved several critical materials that include, ITO (Indium Tin Oxide, ADN (Anthracene derivatives), NPB (N,N'-Di(1-naphthyl)-N,N'-diphenylbenzidine), Alq3 (tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminium) and glass (Thejo Kalyani & Dhoble). Because of the intensive mining processes required for extraction, each of these materials has a large environmental footprint. Each of these materials has a distinct environmental footprint primarily due to the intensive mining processes required for their extraction (Ferreira). In OLED panels, ITO serves as a transparent conducting layer. The processing of zinc ore is the main source of indium (Thejo Kalyani & Dhoble). Because heavy metals and other hazardous materials are released into the soil and water during this extraction process, local ecosystems and human water supplies may become contaminated (Ferreira). Blue light emitters in OLEDs are made of ADN molecules (Thejo Kalyani & Dhoble). In the process of producing them, intricate chemical reactions produce air pollutants and dangerous byproducts. There is a greater chance of environmental contamination when these compounds are not handled and disposed of properly (Ferreira). NPB is used as a hole transport layer, essentially a facilitator for all the detailed movement that goes on in a screen that improves the device's performance (Jiang, et al). NPB’s “facilitate hole extraction and transportation while blocking electron flux. Hole-transport materials are deposited between the photoactive layer and the anode, improving the device performance” (Huang, et al). NPB is synthesized through chemical processes involving organic solvents. These solvents cause the atmosphere to become polluted with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which can lead to health issues for workers and the surrounding community (Ferreira). Alq3 is frequently utilized in OLEDs as an electron transport layer (Thejo Kalyani & Dhoble). Al and 8-hydroxyquinoline are used in the production of Alq3. Due to the high energy required in the manufacturing of aluminum, which is frequently derived from fossil fuels, high carbon emissions are a result of this process. Furthermore, the main source of aluminum, bauxite, may be mined, which can lead to serious ecological problems such soil erosion and deforestation (Ferreira). Hazardous chemicals are also used in the manufacturing of 8-hydroxyquinoline, which, if improperly handled, might lead to environmental damage. The substrate for OLED screens is made of high-purity glass. Because silica sand must be mined in order to produce this glass, ecosystems are destroyed and fine particulate matter is released into the atmosphere, contributing to air pollution (Hanif, et al). Furthermore, the energy-intensive process of making glass results in large carbon dioxide emissions, which fuel global warming. Pollution is a major issue for the production of OLED screens, but specific toxic materials make the waste and emissions more difficult to mitigate.

The manufacturing process of the Kodak OLED screen is another part of its environmental impact. The procedure uses a lot of energy and power, most of which comes from non-renewable sources, which increases the carbon footprint (Amasawa, et al). The manufacturing process of the Kodak OLED screen is another part of its environmental impact. The procedure uses a lot of energy and power, most of which comes from non-renewable sources, which increases the carbon footprint (Yeom, et al). Significant carbon emissions are produced by the high energy requirements for the production of OLED screens. Even though OLEDs require less energy when in use, some of these advantages are offset by the energy-intensive initial manufacturing process. Numerous chemicals that can release VOCs and other pollutants are used in the manufacturing process. In addition to lowering air quality, these emissions are harmful to people's health (Ferreira). The environmental impact is still significant even with efforts to optimize production processes and cut emissions. Businesses are attempting to increase efficiency and lower pollution. With ITO and other toxic chemicals becoming more abundant, disposal sites are having trouble removing them. 

While OLED screens are known for their energy efficiency during usage, the end-of-life phase presents significant environmental challenges. During their lifecycle, OLED panels have a lower total environmental effect than standard LCDs since they require less power to operate. The costs to the environment incurred in their creation and disposal, however, outweigh this gain. There are serious environmental risks associated with OLED screen disposal (Rocchetti et al).. If they are not properly recycled, the heavy metals and other harmful materials they contain may seep into the land and water (Peng and Shehabi). The absence of effective OLED component recycling procedures at the moment is contributing to the growing issue of electronic trash (e-waste). While there are electronic recycling programs in place, they are not well-known or efficient. To handle OLED trash more responsibly, new developments in recycling technologies and improved regulatory frameworks are required (Ferreira). For instance, enhancing material recyclability and creating more effective recycling procedures might lessen the negative environmental effects of discarded OLED panels. Finding ways to create an OLED screen with renewable materials is tough but attainable goal.

The life cycle of the Kodak OLED screen, from material extraction through manufacturing to disposal, reveals significant environmental challenges despite the technology's advantages in display quality and energy efficiency during use. I have highlighted the considerable waste and emissions associated with the extraction of key materials such as ITO, NPB, ADN, Alq3, and glass. The manufacturing processes further exacerbate environmental impacts through high energy consumption and the release of hazardous chemicals. Finally, the disposal phase presents substantial issues due to the presence of toxic substances and the inadequacy of current recycling practices. Broader implications of this research underscore the urgent need for more sustainable practices across the entire life cycle of OLED screens. It is clear that while technological advancements have led to improvements in energy efficiency and display quality, these benefits are counterbalanced by significant environmental costs. This paradox highlights the critical importance of developing more eco-friendly manufacturing processes, improving recycling methods, and sourcing materials responsibly. 

Bibliography

Amasawa, Eri, et al. “Life Cycle Assessment of Organic Light Emitting Diode Display as Emerging Materials and Technology.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, 1 Nov. 2016, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616309131. 

Cok, Ronald S. OLED Display and Touch Screen. 7 Nov. 2006. 

Ferreira, Fernanda. “How Does the Environmental Impact of Mining for Clean Energy Metals Compare to Mining for Coal, Oil and Gas?” MIT Climate Portal, 8 May 2023, climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-does-environmental-impact-mining-clean-energy-metals-compare-mining-coal-oil-and-gas. 

Hanif, Asid, et al. “Sustainable Use of Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) Glass Wastes as Cement Replacement in Concrete.” Materials Today: Proceedings, Elsevier, 20 Apr. 2023, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785323021090. 

Huang, Yuge, et al. “Mini-Led, Micro-Led and OLED Displays: Present Status and Future Perspectives.” Light, Science & Applications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 18 June 2020, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303200/.

“Inside an OLED Display.” MacroPolo, 12 Nov. 2019, macropolo.org/digital-projects/supply-chain/oled-display/inside-an-oled-display/#:~:text=Scientists%20at%20the%20Eastman%20Kodak,made%20by%20Japan’s%20Pioneer%20Corporation.

Jiang, Quan, et al. “A White Organic Light Emitting Diode Based on Anthracene-Triphenylamine Derivatives.” NASA/ADS, Oct. 2010, ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010SPIE.7658E..35J/abstract. 

Liu, Zhifeng, et al. “Sage Journals: Your Gateway to World-Class Research Journals.” A Study of Waste Liquid Crystal Display Generation in Mainland China, SageJournals, 5 Nov. 2015, journals.sagepub.com/. 

Lynsky, Cheyenne, et al. “Improved Vertical Carrier Transport for Green III-Nitride Leds Using (in,GA)N Alloy Quantum Barriers.” Physical Review Applied, American Physical Society (APS), 31 May 2022, www.osti.gov/biblio/1979649.

Miller, Naomi J., and Lia C. Irvin. “What the Flicker Is Going on Here? Temporal Light Modulation in Automotive Lighting.” What the Flicker Is Going on Here? Temporal Light Modulation in Automotive Lighting (Conference) | OSTI.GOV, 9 Apr. 2024, www.osti.gov/biblio/2335919.

Peng, Peng, and Arman Shehabi. “Regional Economic Potential for Recycling Consumer Waste Electronics in the United States.” Nature Sustainability, Springer Nature, 3 Nov. 2022, www.osti.gov/biblio/2278641.

Rocchetti, Laura, and Francesca Beolchini. “Environmental Burdens in the Management of End-of-Life Cathode Ray Tubes.” Waste Management, 15 Feb. 2014, www.osti.gov/biblio/22304619.

Thejo Kalyani, N., and S.J. Dhoble. “Novel Materials for Fabrication and Encapsulation of Oleds.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Pergamon, 7 Jan. 2015, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114010090#s0065. 

Verlag, Fraunhofer. “Electronics Goes Green 2020+.” Electronics Goes Green, 1 Sept. 2020, electronicsgoesgreen.org/. 

Yeom, Ji-Min, et al. “Environmental Effects of the Technology Transition from Liquid–Crystal Display (LCD) to Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) Display from an E-Waste Management Perspective - International Journal of Environmental Research.” SpringerLink, Springer International Publishing, 28 May 2018, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41742-018-0106-y.